Vanilla 1.1.9 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
Posted By: maryyugo@JoshsI'm sorry but I don't get that. In order to realize a finite percentage gain on something it first has to exist, and Steorn says that input power beyond what causes Joule heating in the coils does not.
You're right but what Lister said may help to assist the less rabid believers to understand the claim and how imbecilic it and Sean's last so-called experiment are.
Popoff was once exposed by Randi. He seems to be doing quite well selling a slightly different brand of piss.
BTW, Popoff is a failure of Randi's ghostbusting methods. He resurrected himself and succeeds in flimflamming millions of people world wide despite his spectacular "outing" on the Tonight Show many years ago.
Posted By: RunningBareHeathen!
Posted By: Knuckles OToole
I take it you're a "Neat" freak.
Posted By: RunningBareBabcat has switched to 120% proof, I've advised him to stop drinking now.Babcat has latched onto slope versus absolute. He either doesn't understand or doesn't want to acknowledge that letting pressure off the brakes does not overunity make.
http://www.steorn.com/forum/comments.php?DiscussionID=62778&page=1#Item_18
I think it is routine now that if anyone posts anything that is seen to be pro Steorn, then within that exchange they will get slated somewhere down the thread.
So no surprise that most of the SKDB do not interact in these forums anymore.
I also met Babcat over in Dublin and can say from first hand that he is a very open and sincere person.
His knowledge of what Steorn claim is not simply accepting their overview of things, he has researched nearly every part of the information he has been given in detail and watched at how it has been implemented and tested.
His conclusion is based on this and not just blind faith as portrayed.
So when asking his opinion, why not just accept his answer, just like he accepts other peoples opinions.
Posted By: maryyugoThis is why I have problems with ClaNZer's objectivity and general smarts (and yes, he machines plastic very well):Is that Clanzer trying to say that Babcat has dutifully followed Sean down the garden path? Is he trying to ask that people respect bull shit assessments that are based on bull shit garden pathing?I think it is routine now that if anyone posts anything that is seen to be pro Steorn, then within that exchange they will get slated somewhere down the thread.
So no surprise that most of the SKDB do not interact in these forums anymore.
I also met Babcat over in Dublin and can say from first hand that he is a very open and sincere person.
His knowledge of what Steorn claim is not simply accepting their overview of things, he has researched nearly every part of the information he has been given in detail and watched at how it has been implemented and tested.
His conclusion is based on this and not just blind faith as portrayed.
So when asking his opinion, why not just accept his answer, just like he accepts other peoples opinions.
From:http://www.steorn.com/forum/comments.php?DiscussionID=62778&page=1#Item_11
Posted By: Clanzer
...So when asking his opinion, why not just accept his answer, just like he accepts other peoples opinions.