Vanilla 1.1.9 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
Posted By: AngusDoes everybody agree? It seems to me that there are examples of strong emergence in chaotic systems and cellular automata.
Posted By: pcstruPosted By: AngusDoes everybody agree? It seems to me that there are examples of strong emergence in chaotic systems and cellular automata.
I'd say we look out from an example of strong emergence, not weak. Must that be in conflict with the standard model; I don't quite get that claim. You cannot derive it - sure, but that is by definition. That also muddies her "there is no evidence for that" - well, she is a materialist, where exactly does she expect to find that evidence?
Posted By: pcstruOur fondness for Science, facts, objectivity is just a reflection that we like easy answers. Our rejection of philosophy a reflection that we don't like to ask difficult questions, perhaps especially of ourselves.
Posted By: Angushttps://youtu.be/bJE6-VTdbjw
Does everybody agree? It seems to me that there are examples of strong emergence in chaotic systems and cellular automata.
Posted By: Andrew PalfreymanI liked her grin when she mentioned consciousness.
Posted By: PathoskepticPosted By: Angushttps://youtu.be/bJE6-VTdbjw
Does everybody agree? It seems to me that there are examples of strong emergence in chaotic systems and cellular automata.
I don't say truly emergent systems do not exist. I just say most of it is just a misunderstanding.
Posted By: PathoskepticWhat looks like strong emergence, is just ripples of lost information.
Posted By: PathoskepticWhat looks like strong emergence, is just ripples of lost information.
Posted By: alsetalokinI was in that crowd somewherePosted By: PathoskepticWhat looks like strong emergence, is just ripples of lost information.
ripples in a Sea of Joy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJ44k5LQsUg
Posted By: PathoskepticGoes without saying,