Then consider it a conclusion from a premise voiced out loud because the conclusion is intriguing. But like most, I reject the premise, which answers al's query.
What makes you think my "you" refers to you in particular? Guilty conscience? What's my criticism? There's not enough gadolinium in the matrix, obviously.
I'm wondering what kind of mathematics we'll have in, say, a thousand years.
I don't know how GR could have been described without Riemann's stuff. It rescued Albert, and fortunately was already around, although still quite new. For the new stuff we'll discover, maybe having to do with dark energy, or whatever it turns out to be, chances are we'll need brand spanking new mathematics. That's the way it's worked so far, at least.
Sounds like another round of "which came first - things or the mathematics that describes them" is about to begin. Get your popcorn and drinks now while the concession is open.